| Ideas & Application: 40% |
Highly perceptive exploration of the topic at hand, with substantial attention paid to viability and execution. Full engagement. |
Perceptive exploration of the topic at hand, with attention paid to viability and execution. High engagement. |
Some exploration of the topic at hand, little attention paid to viability or execution. Low engagement. |
Little or no exploration of the topic at hand, no attention paid to viability or execution. No engagement. |
| Clarity: 20% |
Clear, highly concise writing, with all points addressed fully and elegantly. |
Clear, concise writing, with the majority of points addressed fully and elegantly. |
Acceptable writing, with most points at least partially addressed. |
Writing is difficult to follow, few points addressed. |
| Support: 20% |
Fully researched and substantiated with well developed detail. Likely includes original research. |
Fully researched and substantiated with well developed detail. |
Researched and partially substantiated with some detail. |
Poorly researched, relies on opinion to substantiate what should be researched. |
| Style: 20% |
Artfully executed. No grammatical errors or other distractions. |
Well executed. Few grammatical errors or other distractions. |
Executed. Grammatical errors are a distraction. |
Poorly executed. High volume of grammatical errors. |
Print