Print| Your Original Case Post | Your Response | |
|---|---|---|
| Ideas and Application |
28/30 Excellent idea for the expansion of the case material and introduction of a beautifully fit concept. |
9.5/10 Well-founded contrarian response to Jane's points, and well-synthesized ideation. |
| Clarity |
13/15 Clear and succinct writing in general; a few points were not entirely explained. |
4/5 A little vague at points. |
| Support |
14.5/15 Excellent use of original resources to substantiate, tightly researched. |
4.5/5 Well supported citations. |
| Style |
13/15 Very approachable overall, and generated robust follow-up discussions with peers. |
3.5/5 A few grammatical errors took away from the reading. |
Overall: I enjoyed your side analysis of Tesla's constraints in growth and practical concerns for innovation. For next time, I would recommend relying more on available research to underscore your points of comparison to more conventional automakers. Your use of process tools has progressed significantly in the past three weeks.