Please read the section on Price Discrimination in Chapter 10, "Price-Searcher Markets with Low Entry Barriers." In the most recent version of the book, this is on pages 198-200.
Because we have a deadweight loss in a monopoly, some social wealth is not collected. This means that a society is poorer, in total, because of the existence of a monopoly. But it is possible for a producer to capture some of this lost wealth. This can be done by using price discrimination. Price discrimination refers to charging different prices to different customers. In a perfectly competitive market, this is not possible, because there are many firms competing for the price; but it is possible in a monopoly, because people have no other place to buy.
If the seller is able to discover just what price the buyer is willing to pay (what the buyer’s Reservation Price is), and offer a price incrementally below the reservation price, then the seller is capturing basically all of the total surplus.
There are three general ways in which price discrimination can occur:
The Philadelphia Zoo discovers that they have two groups of customers with two different demand curves. Locals have demand P = 40 – 0.2Q, and tourists have demand 50 – 0.1Q. What is the profit maximizing set of prices? (The marginal cost of visitors is zero.)
In this case, we have two separate demand curves, and as a monopolist we wish to maximize profit by charging each separate part of the market a separate, monopolistic price.
For locals, demand is given as P = 40 - 0.2Q, so MR = 40 - 0.4Q.
For tourists, demand is given as P = 50 - 0.1Q, so MR = 50 - 0.2Q.
So, the answer is, if it wishes to maximize profits, the zoo should charge locals $20 for admission, and $25 to tourists. Of course, in this case, the trick involves being able to effectively separate locals and tourists.
After this lesson and the associated readings, you should be able to: