EME 504
Foundations in Sustainability Systems

Overview

Please watch the following video: 6:14

Module 2 video
Credit: © Penn State University, is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Click for transcript.

PRESENTER: One of the aims of sustainability science is to guide social, economic, and environmental policy. Now, that kind of actionable item comes with certain degrees of consequences. So policy is something that needs to be measured. You need to be able to quantify and characterize how far away you are from your ultimate goal.

Quantifying and characterizing how far we are from attaining sustainability comes with many different challenges. One of the challenges is that because we need to be very pragmatic, we end up assigning values to different objects. So whereas it might come as a counter-intuitive thing to assign quantitative value to natural beauty, to assign a quantitative value to your experience in your neighborhood, you need to be able to measure those in order to determine whether or not you're approaching your goal, whether or not you're likely to succeed.

So you can see how it is very tempting to assign a monetary value to different resources. And once you start assigning a monetary value to different resources, it is very easy to see how you can trade natural resources with man-made resources. So this is the foundation of weak sustainability. And in weak sustainability, you are buying man-made capital with natural capital. Now, where that might be certainly easier to measure than something that is intangible, such as the natural beauty that you're observing in the background, it comes with a number of different problems.

So when do you say that you can no longer buy man-made capital with natural capital? Where do you put the boundaries on how much you can use, if you potentially could continue to produce man-made capital by putting ecosystems, by putting environmental resources and their very extreme constraints?

The other end member of weak sustainability is strong sustainability. And in strong sustainability, we don't start from the point of commoditizing individual environmental properties and individual environmental resources. We start by looking at the value of the environmental capital and how it is not easily or possibly replaced by man-made capital.

So a good place to start is talking a little bit about what it is that the environmental capital is. And the environmental capital can be broadly divided into four different types of categories-- the land, the atmosphere, the hydrosphere, and the biosphere. Clearly, these four categories are incredibly broad and include a wide variety of things.

The atmosphere, for example, includes the climate. The hydrosphere includes a number of different things that have already been commoditized, such as hydropower, access to different reservoirs, groundwater, the quality of these waters, and the access to these waters. The land not only includes soils and their quality and fertility, but they also include mineral resources, geomorphic properties-- basically, are we dealing with flat land versus a very hilly landscape, for example? And finally, the biosphere can be divided into an immense number of different things-- from understanding the different links within an ecosystem to understanding the source of calories that they can provide and the genetic and pharmacological capital that they can provide.

We are at Greenwood Furnace. That is a park that is in Central Pennsylvania. And you can see some real examples of natural capital being expressed. You have very large access to water. What you're not seeing right now, it's the reason why some of these structures were built, which was the extraction of iron ore, supported by the presence of limestone and finally, the access to a lot of biomass, basically, trees to be able to make charcoal to run the furnace.

And what you are also seeing is the fine interactions between the different types of capitals. And those kinds of interactions can include a variety of different things. And they include, of course, links within the ecosystem. But they also can include information, production, such as, historical, research-wise, and educational information, etc., etc. So the fine links between the different types of economic capital make it even more difficult to try and substitute economic man-made capital with environmental capital.

Learning Objectives

  1. Establish the factors leading to the feedback loop among economic growth, resource optimism, and environment.
  2. Predict how commoditization of natural capital results in weak sustainability.
  3. Culturally contextualize anthropocentric, utilitarian natural resource management.
  4. Culturally contextualize conservationist, nature–centric sustainable management.
  5. Explain why natural capital and manufactured capital are independent variables.
  6. Assess the value of quantitative measurements of sustainability.

What is due for Module 2?

This module will take us one week to complete. Please refer to the Course Syllabus for specific time frames and due dates. 

Module 2: Assignments
Requirements Assignment Details
To Do
  • Read and familiarize yourself with all the Module 2 materials.
Read Registered students may access these articles via Canvas/the Penn State Library:
  • Required Reading:
    • Neumayer, E.Weak and Strong Sustainability. Print ISBN: 9781781007075. Chapter 2, Section 2.3: pp. 22-29 and Chapter 6: 169-190. 
Assignment
  • See Module 2 in Canvas for full assignment details

Questions?

If you have any questions, please post them to our Questions? discussion (not email), located in Canvas. I will check that discussion forum daily to respond. While you are there, feel free to post your own responses if you, too, are able to help out a classmate.