The purpose of this lesson is for you to review key concepts from Lesson 1 (Energy and Sustainability) of EMSC 240N. I strongly encourage you to at least browse through Lesson 1 [1] of EMSC 240N, though that is not required.
By the end of this lesson, you should be able to:
| To Read | Lesson 1 Online Content | You're here! |
|---|---|---|
| To Do |
Lesson 1 Quiz Lesson 1 Journal Entry Lesson 1 Discussion Board Post #1 |
Canvas Modules > Lesson 1 Canvas Modules > Lesson 1 Canvas Modules > Lesson 1 |
If you have any general course questions, please post them to our HAVE A QUESTION discussion forum located under the Discussions tab in Canvas. I will check that discussion forum regularly to respond as appropriate. While you are there, feel free to post your own responses and comments if you are able to help out a classmate. If you have a question but would like to remain anonymous to the other students, email me through Canvas.
If you have something related to the material that you'd like to share, feel free to post to the Coffee Shop forum, also under the Discussions tab in Canvas.
Thermodynamics is defined by NASA [2] as "the study of the effects of work, heat, and energy on a system." Any time you discuss energy transfer, assess the efficiency of a piece of equipment, or analyze the conversion of energy from one form to another, it involves thermodynamics.
Energy is defined as "the ability to do work," and work is the transfer of energy or the application of force across a distance. If this were a Physics or Thermodynamics course, we'd be more concerned about work, but for better or worse it is not, so we will stick to focusing on energy. For the purposes of this course, there are a few important things to remember about energy:
The following discussion of energy forms is taken nearly word-for-word from EM SC 240N. Direct quotes are from this reading from the National Energy Education Development (NEED) Project [3], which you are welcome, but not required, to read.
The two categories of energy are potential and kinetic. Potential energy is stored energy and kinetic energy is energy in motion. The forms of energy are as follows:
Differentiating the various forms of energy is usually straightforward, but I have noticed that people often confuse thermal and radiant energy. This is probably because most people associate "thermal" with "heat," so when something generates heat, it is assumed that thermal energy is being released. Please keep in mind that radiant energy travels in waves, and is released by everything above absolute zero (humans have never observed absolute zero). Radiant energy emanates in all directions from everything, and the hotter the object, the more and more intense radiant energy it emits. All radiant energy is invisible to the human eye except for energy in the visible spectrum. Thermal energy, on the other hand, is energy in the vibrating molecules of a substance. Again, everything above absolute zero has thermal energy, i.e., its molecules are vibrating. Thermal energy is contained within the molecule(s) and is not emitted.
Energy is constantly changing forms all around you (and everywhere else on earth) all of the time. All forms of energy can end up as all other forms of energy, and recall that the First Law of Thermodynamics dictates that all energy, irrespective of its form, comes from somewhere else. Again, the following is taken almost word-for-word from EM SC 240N.
Take a few minutes to look around you. Based on what you know about energy, what is energy “doing” where you are right now? What forms can you identify? (Seriously, take a look.)
Considering I can't see you right now (Or can I? Hmm...), I'll just give you a few probable examples. If you are inside, light is coming from somewhere, whether it’s a light bulb on the ceiling, sunlight coming through a window, or at least coming from the screen you are looking at (this is electromagnetic/radiant energy). Any sound you hear is sound energy. Everything around you is radiating heat, which is a form of radiant/electromagnetic energy. Since everything in and around you has a temperature above absolute zero, it has vibrating molecules and thus thermal energy. If you are moving at all - even the slightest twitch of an eyelid - your body is using motion energy. Merely thinking about this question requires your brain to use electrical energy.
We could go on and on. But as you probably know, these are all examples of kinetic energy. There are also a number of types of potential energy around you. Think of some examples of potential energy around (and in) you right now. You are able to move and think because of chemical (potential) energy inside of your body. In fact, everything around you has chemical potential energy. Any object on the wall, on a table, attached to the ceiling, or just above the ground has gravitational (potential) energy because it is above the ground. There is also nuclear (potential) energy in all matter because all matter has at least one nucleus. Again, we could go on and on, but the point is that everything around you has potential energy, and thus has the ability to do work, i.e., “to make things happen.”
All of the examples of energy that were noted above came from somewhere else. The light coming from a light bulb is converted from electrical energy running through a wire. The heat radiating from non-living things around you was absorbed from another source such as sunlight or the heating system of the building. The motion and electrical energy your body has right now come from the chemical energy inside of your body. The gravitational energy of things around you came from motion energy required to lift the objects. And so on. And recall that each time energy was transferred, work was done.
Efficiency is an often used term when discussing energy, e.g., "I have an efficient car," "How efficient is your furnace?", and "The average efficiency of a coal-fired power plant is around 33%." Though the term is thrown around a lot, it has a specific meaning. Energy efficiency is the amount of useful output per unit of input. The "useful" part of that definition is important since the First Law of Thermodynamics requires that all energy that goes into something must go somewhere.
The video below provides a very good explanation and animation of how a coal-fired power plant works. Think it's as easy as dumping a bunch of coal into a furnace and turning a turbine? Watch the video to find out.
First Energy operates twenty power plants in the Northeast United States that produce nearly seventy million megawatt-hours of electricity each year for over 4 million residential, commercial, and industrial customers. Over half of First Energy's electricity is produced by using coal, compared to about 60 percent nationwide. Let's see how electricity is generated from coal by taking a virtual tour of a coal-fired power plant similar to those operated by First Energy.
This plant has three generating units that produce more than 2,000 megawatts of electricity. At full capacity, this one power plant can produce enough electricity to supply the needs of one and a half million homes and businesses.
Generating electricity requires a fuel source. At this plant, the fuel source is coal which arrives mainly by a barge but also by rail and truck. Each barge delivers 1500 tons of coal - enough to keep the plant running for a couple of hours. The plant uses about 21,000 tons of coal each day, so over a million tons of coal is stockpiled next to the plant. A device called a stacker reclaimer scoops coal onto a quarter mile long conveyor that can transport up to 900 tons of coal into the plant each hour.
Once inside the plant, up to a thirty-hour supply of coal can be stored in bunkers. Coal moves from the bunkers to feeders to be measured and moved to pulverizers. Each generating unit has 16 coal feeders that supply 8 pulverizers. Coal enters the pulverizer and spins in a large drum where hundreds of steel balls grind it into a fine powder.
Now a fine powder, the coal leaves the pulverizers and heads to the boiler. About 335 tons of coal can be pulverized per hour.
Large fans add warm air to the powdery coal and blow it into the boiler. The boiler has miles of tubes filled with high-quality water. Once inside the boiler, the coal ignites, releasing energy and generating intense heat that changes the water inside the tubes to hot dry steam. The temperature of the steam is now about 1,000 degrees Fahrenheit. This process generates thermal energy which is transformed to mechanical energy at the turbine which is the next stop on our tour.
High-pressure steam, now one thousand degrees Fahrenheit at 3500 pounds per square inch is piped from the boiler to the first in a series of turbines. Here it expands between layers of turbine blades mounted on the turbine shaft. The steam loops back to the furnace, then on to the second turbine. In this process, the steam turns the series of turbines 3600 revolutions per minute providing power to the generator, the last in the series of machines. The generator continuously creates an electrical charge of 34,481 amps at 18000 volts of electricity. From here, the electricity leaves the plant and begins its journey to customers.
After the steam has been used to create electricity, it is exhausted from the turbine and sent to a condenser to be changed back into water. Inside the condenser, steam passes over the outside of pipes filled with chilled water from the cooling towers. The steam condenses to water and returns to the boilers to repeat the steam generating process over again. As the steam condenses, the chilled water inside the condenser pipes becomes warm from the heat of the steam so it is sent to a cooling tower. These particular towers are called natural draft cooling towers, which are designed with no moving parts. Inside, the water splashes over a series of baffles which breaks up the water into small droplets. These droplets mix with air from the open bottom of the tower evaporating some of the water and cooling the rest by as much as 27 degrees. The newly chilled water returns to the condenser to repeat the process of cooling more steam.
Since 1971, First Energy has spent more than $5 billion dollars on environmental protection. Our plants are equipped with air quality control systems to remove sulfur dioxide and particulates called fly ash. Fly ash is removed by a mechanical process and sulfur dioxide is removed with a chemical reaction using lime. These processes take place in large ductwork scrubber trains located between a unit's boiler and its chimney. Boiler gasses pass through scrubbing vessels and are sprayed with slurry, a mixture of water and lime. The sulfur dioxide particles and other pollutants are absorbed by the slurry and fall to the bottom of the vessels. A fan releases the cleansed gases through the chimney. By the time this happens, more than 99 percent of particulates have been removed, as well as ninety-two percent of sulfur dioxide. A plant similar to this one can remove over 400,000 tons of sulfur dioxide each year.
The scrubbing process creates a huge amount of a byproduct called calcium sulfite. This plant could create more than 3 million gallons of calcium sulfite slurry each day. First Energy created a process that turns that waste product into a valuable building material called gypsum which is used to make wallboard or drywall. The slurry leaving the scrubbers is thickened and pumped through a forced oxidation gypsum or fog system. Oxygen is then added changing it into gypsum which is dried, treated, and sent to a gypsum manufacturer to make wallboard.
First Energy recycles about a half million tons of gypsum each year - enough to manufacture wallboard for seventy thousand new homes.
Precipitators are another method of extracting coal ash, also called fly ash, which can be recycled or deposited in landfills. This mechanical process extracts fly ash left over from the combustion process. These poles called rappers shake fly ash from a vibrating wire. Gas from the furnace containing fly ash flows into the box. The fly ash drops into a storage chamber and is blown into silos to be loaded into a truck.
Fly ash from First Energy plants is used in manufacturing a variety of products, including concrete, grouting, roofing shingles, granules, and anti-skid road materials.
First Energy also uses a selective catalytic reduction technology or SCR to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions. SCR systems work much like a catalytic converter on a car. Flue gas containing nitrogen oxide emissions from the combustion process is mixed with ammonia. The mixed gases travel through a series of catalytic layers which causes the nitrogen oxides to react with the ammonia. The reaction converts the nitrogen oxides to water vapor and pure nitrogen, a benign chemical that makes up eighty percent of the air we breathe. Both elements are returned to the environment through the station stacks.
Now that we've taken a look at how electricity is produced and some of the environmental control protection systems used in our plants, let's take a look at how the electricity is delivered to our homes and businesses. Transformers located just outside the plant boost the power from 18,000 volts to 345,000 volts so it can travel long distances over transmission lines to where it is needed. Substations located along the path reduce the voltage so it can be moved along distribution lines attached to the utility poles. As the electricity nears customer locations, transformers on poles step down the power for use in homes and businesses.
(Music) We hope you enjoyed seeing how energy is produced at First Energy, where our energy is working for you.
All energy-using (and generating) technologies have an efficiency - TVs, light bulbs, solar panels, cell phones, wind turbines, airplane engines, electric motors, you name it. One important aspect to know is that when energy is converted, it is physically impossible to convert all of the energy into useful output. In other words, it is not possible for anything to be 100% efficient. This is dictated by the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The Second Law has other implications, but they are not important in the context of this course. If you'd like to learn more about the Second Law, see the video below and/or this [8]link.
The second law can be confusing, but the narrator in the video below does a pretty good job of explaining some aspects of it.
Let's talk about the Second Law of Thermodynamics. This law is weird. There are about 10 different ways to state it, which is one reason why it's weird. Let's start with one of the most common ways to state it, which is, if you've got a cold object and a hot object, heat will never be seen to flow spontaneously from a colder object to a hotter object. So if you have these two sitting together, maybe an ice cube and a hot piece of metal, and you make them touch, heat's going to flow between them, but we know what's gonna happen. The heat's gonna flow from the hot object to the cold object, and never the other way. At least, not spontaneously. You can force heat from a cold object to a hot object as we do with a refrigerator or a freezer, but that's using a heat pump. And those refrigerators and freezers are doing work to force that heat from the cold region into the hot region. It won't do it spontaneously by itself. You've got to force it to do it. So what the second law says, or at least one version of it is that that process will never be seen to happen in reverse. The heat will never be seen to flow from the cold object to the hot object. Now, you might be thinking, "Duh. "Do we really need a law to tell us that?" But it's not so obvious, because you can still conserve energy and momentum and all the other rules of physics and laws of physics by allowing heat to flow from the cold object to the hot object. In other words, let's say the cold object started with 10 Joules of thermal energy and the hot object started with ... It's hotter, so let's just say it has 30 Joules of thermal energy. You could imagine five Joules of energy going from the cold object into the hot object which would leave you with five Joules of energy for the cold object, 35 Joules of thermal energy for the hot object. You still have 40, just like you did before. You didn't break the law of conservation of energy. It's just, energy won't go that way. So why? Why is thermal energy never seen to flow from the cold object to the hot object, even though it satisfies every other known law of physics besides the second law? Well, before we answer that question, I think it'd be useful to talk about an alternate version of the second law, which looks something like this. The total disorder will never be seen to decrease. What do I mean by "disorder"? Imagine you had a room and there were blue spheres. And they're bouncing around wildly. So these all have some velocity and random directions. And when they strike a wall or each other, they lose no energy. So they keep bouncing around like crazy. And then there's another section of the room with red spheres, and these are also bouncing around randomly. They lose no energy. They keep doing their thing. Except, there's a divider in this room that doesn't allow the red spheres to go onto the blue spheres' side and vice versa. These can't mix up. So right now, this is an ordered state because the reds are separated from the blues. So we say that this state has a certain amount of order to it. But let's imagine we removed the divider. Now, what's gonna happen? Well, you'll see these things mix up. This blue sphere will move over here, and it'll bounce onto this side. This red sphere will go over here. They'll just keep getting mixed up. And at some given moment, you might find the spheres in some configuration like this. They're still bouncing around, but now they're all mixed up and we say that this state has a higher amount of disorder. This is not ordered. We say that this is more disordered, which supports the second law. The second law says, if you let things do what they wanna do spontaneously, your system will go from a more ordered state to a more disordered state. And you'll never see it go the other way. We can stand in this room and wait. But you're probably never gonna see the blue spheres line up all on the left side and the right spheres line up on the right side. With 12 total spheres, maybe if you wait long enough, a really long time, you might catch it where all the red spheres are on one side and blues are on the other. But imagine this. Imagine now, instead of six reds and six blues, there's 100 reds, 1,000 reds, maybe 10 to the 23d and Avogadro's number of reds, and now they're all mixed up. The odds of ever seeing them get back to this ordered state are basically zero. The probability isn't exactly zero, but the probability is very, very low that you would ever see a disordered state with that many numbers of particles reassemble themselves into an ordered state.
So we kind of just know that from experience and what we've seen in our day-to-day lives. But you still might be wondering, "How come? "How come we never see a disordered state go to an ordered state?" Well, it basically has to do with counting. If you were to count all the possible ways of lining up the reds over here on this side and the blues on the left-hand side, there'd be a lot of combinations that would satisfy that condition. I mean, you could swap this red with that red, and this red with that red, all on the right-hand side. All these reds could get swapped around. And these blues, as well. They can get swapped around on the left-hand side. You get a large number of variations that would satisfy the condition of blues on the left, reds on the right. But now I want you to ask yourself, how many possibilities are there for having blues and reds spread out through the whole room? Well, you could probably convince yourself, there's more. And it turns out, there'll be a lot more. Now this red doesn't just have to maintain its position on the right-hand side somewhere. This red can get swapped out anywhere over here. I can swap a red with this blue, and this blue with this red, and this red with this red, and this blue with this blue. I can move them all over. Now that these spheres have the whole room through which they can mix, the number of states that will have blues and reds mixed throughout the whole room will vastly outnumber the number of states that have just reds on one side and just blues on the other side. And this simple idea is the basis for the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Roughly speaking, the Second Law of Thermodynamics holds because there are so many more disordered states than there are ordered states. Now, I'm gonna tell you something that you might not like. This particular disordered state that I have drawn, this exact one, is just as likely as this exact ordered state. In other words, if I get rid of the barrier over here, if you came in, you'd be just as likely to find the room in this exact configuration as you were to find it in this exact configuration. These two exact states are equally likely, which sounds weird. It makes you think, "Well, you're just as likely to find an ordered state as a disordered state." But no. This particular state is just as likely as this other particular state. But there are so many more mixed-up states than there are separated states. Even though any particular state is just as likely, since the mixed-up states vastly outnumber the separated states, if you pick one at random, it's gonna be a mixed-up state because there are so many more of them. Imagine putting these all into a hat. Imagine writing down all the possible configurations of states, ordered, disordered, in between. You put them all into a hat, you pull one out randomly, any particular state is just as likely. But since there are so many more disordered states, you pick one out randomly, it's probably gonna be mixed up. And if there's a large number of particles, you're almost certain to find it mixed up. So to help us keep these ideas straight, we need some different terms. Physicists came up with a couple terms. One is a macrostate. And a macrostate is basically saying, okay, the particles are mixed up. That's one possible macrostate. And we could be more precise. We can say, the reds and the blues can be anywhere within the box. Another possible macrostate would be to say that the particles are separated, that is to say, reds are on this side, anywhere on that side, but on the right side, and blues are on the left side, anywhere on the left side. These terms are referring to a macrostate, an overall description of what you would see. Now, there's another term, a microstate. And a microstate is a precise, exact description of the nitty-gritty details of what every particle is doing within there. If I just tell you, "The particles are mixed up," you're not gonna know exactly where they are. Similarly, if I just tell you, "They're separated," you're not gonna know exactly where they are. You'll know they'll be on the right-hand side, the red ones will, but you won't know. Maybe this red ones moves down here, maybe this red one moves up here. The microstate is an exact description. This red one's right here, going a particular speed. This blue one's right here, going a particular speed. If you specify the exact location, blue right here, blue right there, going that fast, red right here, what you're describing to me is a microstate. And so the second law, another way of thinking about it, there are more microstates for a disordered macrostate than there are microstates for an ordered macrostate. And that's why we see systems go from order to disorder. It's really just a statistical result of counting up the possible number of states. You might be wondering, what does this have to do with heat going from hot to cold, all this talk about microstates and macrostates? Well, it's not just position that can get disordered. It's velocities that can get disordered, energy that can get disordered, and that's more of like what's happening up here. The positions of the hot molecules aren't necessarily moving over into the cold range. But the energy over here is getting dissipated into the cold area. So image it this way. Let's get rid of all this. And imagine you had a room with gas in it, but this gas was kind of weird. At this particular moment, all the gas molecules on the right-hand side were moving really fast, and all the gas molecules on the left-hand side were moving really slow. So the room was separated into a cold region and a hot region, just like this energy is. This is ordered, or at least, somewhat ordered. It's more ordered than it's going to be. If you wait a while, this is all gonna mix up. You're gonna have some fast-moving particles over here, some slow ones over here. It's all gonna be blended together.
And so, what would you say if you were standing in here? At first, you'd feel cold because these particles don't have a lot of energy. Then you start feeling warmer and warmer. You'd say heat is flowing over to the left because you feel faster-moving particles striking your body. And so you'd rightly say that heat is moving from the right of this room to the left of this room. It flows from the hot to the cold. And that's what's happening up here. Heat flows from the hot to the cold. You might object. These are solids, I said, copper and an ice cube. A copper atom's not gonna make it over into the cold ice cube. But the energy is gonna move. So you can make the same argument over here. Don't allow these, let's say these are the copper atoms moving around fast, or at least jiggling in place rapidly. When they bump into the slower-moving water molecules in the ice cube, they're gonna give those water molecules some of their energy. And this energy's gonna become mixed up. The energy will become disordered. It will go from this ordered state, where the high energy is over here and low energy's here, to a disordered state where the energy's distributed somewhat evenly. So essentially what I'm saying is, if you consider the macrostate, where the hot molecules are separated from the cold molecules, there will be less microstates that satisfy that condition than there will be microstates that satisfy the condition for a macrostate where the energy is mixed up and you're just as likely to find a fast-moving particle on the left as you are on the right. This will have vastly more microstates, many more possible ways of making up a mixed-up state than there are microstates that create a separated state. I mean, there's gonna be a lot. I'm talking a lot of microstates that satisfy this condition for this macrostate, separated. But there will be so many more microstates for the mixed-up case, this dominates. That's why you always see heat flow from a hot object to a cold object, just because it's statistically inevitable with the large number of particles that you have here. There are so many more ways of heat flowing from hot to cold than there are from cold to hot, statistically speaking, you just never see it go the other way. Energy will always, at least spontaneously, if you let it do what it wants to, energy's always going to dissipate and evenly distribute. That's why it goes from the hot to the cold. This energy's trying to get mixed up, just because statistically, there are so many more ways for that to happen. Now, I need to tell you that there's actually a scientific term for the amount of disorder, and we call it the entropy. Physicists use the letter S to denote the entropy. And if you wanna know the formula for the entropy, you could look on Boltzmann's grave. This is Ludwig Boltzmann. He's got it on his gravestone. How awesome is that? The entropy S is k, Boltzmann's constant, times log. This is actually the natural log of W. And W is the number of microstates for a particular macrostate. So you got some configuration, you wanna know the entropy? Just look at what macrostate it's in, count up how many microstates are there for that macrostate, take the log of it, multiply by Boltzmann's constant, that gives you the entropy. And there's a term for this W. It's called the Multiplicity because it's determining the multitude of microstates that satisfy the conditions for a particular macrostate. Now, entropy is cool. Entropy is weird. Entropy is somewhat mysterious and still, probably, has secrets for us to unlock here. I don't have time to go into all of them here, but if you read up on it, entropy has a role to play in the fate of the universe, the beginning of the universe, the arrow of time, maybe our perception, all kinds of facets of physics that are extremely interesting. And entropy, you always find this guy lurking around. And one place you always find entropy is in the Second Law of Thermodynamics because it allows us a third way to state the second law, which is that the total entropy of a closed system will always be seen to increase. Technically, if it's a reversible process, the entropy could stay the same. But honestly, for all real-world processes, the entropy's gonna increase for a closed system, which is to say that the disorder increases.
Renewable energy is defined by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [9] thus: "Renewable energy includes resources that rely on fuel sources that restore themselves over short periods of time and do not diminish." Non-renewable energy is energy that cannot restore itself over a short period of time and does diminish. It is usually easy to distinguish between renewable and non-renewable, but there are some exceptions (more on that in a minute).
Fossil fuels are fossilized hydrocarbons made from organic material. They are considered "fossilized" because they take millions of years to form, they are hydrocarbons because they are made mostly of hydrogen and carbon, and of course organic material refers to living or recently living things.
The three primary fossil fuels used in the world are coal, oil, and natural gas. (As noted in EM SC 240N, oil and natural gas are technically made up of multiple hydrocarbons, but they are each conventionally referred to as individual hydrocarbons.) Feel free to read through the U.S. Energy Information Administration's (U.S. EIA's) summaries of coal [10], oil [11], and natural gas [12] before reading the summaries below.
Since all fossil fuels started out as plants or animals, all of their energy comes from the sun. The solar energy (all radiant energy) is stored as chemical energy when the plant undergoes photosynthesis, then is stored as chemical energy in the fossil fuel itself. It is (usually) released when the fuel undergoes combustion, which results in thermal and ultimately radiant energy release. Note that the physical material of fossil fuels does not come from the sun - the carbon, for example, is pulled from the atmosphere during photosynthesis - but the energy that is released when coal, oil, or natural gas is burned was once solar energy.
Nuclear energy, as discussed above, is the energy that holds the nucleus of atoms together. Nuclear energy in nuclear power plants is extracted using fission of uranium atoms. Fission releases radiant energy, which is used to heat water to steam and turn a turbine, which spins a generator and generates an electrical current. The sun utilizes fusion (fusing hydrogen together to form helium atoms), which then releases radiant energy.
As noted above, renewable energy sources "restore themselves over short periods of time and do not diminish." For a thorough explanation of many renewable energy sources, see this site from the U.S. EIA [13]. A more thorough explanation of these sources is provided later in this course.
As you are no doubt aware, a primary sustainability concern regarding energy use is carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. A carbon-free energy source emits no carbon when energy is being generated. Solar, wind, hydroelectric, and nuclear energy are commonly used carbon-free sources. Carbon neutral sources release CO2 but have no net impact on the CO2 concentration of the atmosphere because they release no more CO2 than was absorbed from the same atmosphere. Biomass is the only carbon-neutral source of energy. Recall that biomass gets its energy from the sun by virtue of it being used by photosynthetic organisms to grow. Biomass is made mostly of carbon, which is integrated into the biomass when CO2 is absorbed from the surrounding air. When said biomass is converted to useful thermal/radiant energy via combustion, the same or less CO2 is released, resulting in a net zero impact on carbon dioxide concentrations. To summarize:
It will help to at least skim through this page of EM SC 240N [18] prior to reading this material, but it is not necessary.
As I'm sure you are aware, the terms sustainable and green are used in many contexts and in many sectors of society. Sustainable growth, sustainable energy, green business, sustainable fashion, green cars, sustainable food, and sustainable consumption are just a small sample of how the terms are used. Many people in the sustainability field (myself included) are concerned that the term has been overused to the point that it is almost meaningless. Robert Engelman, President of the Worldwatch Institute [19], refers to this phenomenon as "sustainababble" in his "Beyond Sustainababble [20]" chapter from Is Sustainability Still Possible?. While this excessive usage of the term is undesirable, it is in some ways understandable because a) sustainability relates to everything that humans do and b) it has become an effective way to market products. Selling stuff to the masses drives the economy (consumer spending historically [21] constitutes around 65% - 70% of U.S. GDP), though such rampant consumerism ironically has a largely negative impact on sustainability. You may recall that EM SC 240N was largely designed to cut through a lot of this "sustainababble," and help you understand what sustainability really means. This course will offer a review of a lot of the concepts in that course, as well as provide some additional ones.
See below for a summary of key sustainability points from Lesson 1 of EM SC 240N:
Sustainability and sustainable development are often thought of as having three core components: environment, economy, and equity. These are commonly referred to as the "3 Es" of sustainability. The 3 Es is a useful way to provide an analytical framework for sustainability. This 3E framework is useful because it provides questions that can be asked when investigating whether or not something is sustainable. While even these terms can be defined in various ways, we will use the following definitions from the reading when analyzing the sustainability implications of something:
The following provides a few more details about each of the 3 Es:
I have a challenge for you: think of something that you did in the past week that did not involve energy.
Okay, so that's not really a fair challenge. Everything we do, even thinking about things that we might do, requires energy. Here's a more reasonable challenge: think of something that you did in the past week that did not involve the use of non-renewable energy.
Any food you eat almost certainly required non-renewable energy. There are obvious connections like farm machinery, artificial fertilizers, and herbicides, transporting food, refrigerating food, cooking food, and packaging food. But even if you grow your own, you likely used a tool or fencing that was manufactured using non-renewables, seeds that were processed and shipped with fossil fuel-using machines, packaging that was made using non-renewable energy, or maybe even plastic row markers made with petroleum-based plastics. Almost all transportation uses non-renewables, most businesses run on non-renewable energy sources (either directly or indirectly through electricity generation), almost all of the products you buy contain materials either made of or that are processed with fossil fuels. The electronic device you are looking at right now is partially made of and manufactured using fossil fuels. In short, modern society is very dependent upon access to non-renewable energy, particularly fossil fuels. As Asher Miller notes in The Post Carbon Reader:
Look around and you'll see that the very fabric of our lives - where we live, what we eat, how we move, what we buy, what we do, and what we value - was woven with cheap, abundant energy. (p. xiv)
The charts below provide some insight into the U.S. and global energy regimes. The first chart is from the International Energy Agency, and the other is from the U.S. EIA. Both are excellent sources of energy information. Please take a look at them and read through the descriptions, and keep in mind that there is one final summative point provided below.
There are a few interesting things to point out from the chart above.
The charts below provide rather dramatic evidence of how important non-renewable energy is to the U.S. Both charts are from the EIA's Annual Energy Outlook (AEO) series, which are published on a yearly basis. A few things worth pointing out:

It should be clear that the vast majority of energy used worldwide comes from non-renewable sources, and this is unlikely to change any time soon. This has a lot of sustainability implications, which we will address in more detail later. From systems thinking perspective, it is important to realize that everything you do requires energy, and it is important to think about where that energy comes from and what the sustainability implications are.
That's it for Lesson 1! Hopefully this review helped solidify these concepts for you. By now you should be able to:
Double-check the to-do list on the Lesson 1 Overview page [28] to make sure you have completed all of the activities listed there before you begin Lesson 2.
Links
[1] https://www.e-education.psu.edu/emsc240/node/383
[2] http://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/thermo.html
[3] http://cse.ssl.berkeley.edu/energy/Resources/Intro%20to%20Energy%20Reading.pdf
[4] https://www.flickr.com/photos/potat0man/8106833946
[5] http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/atv.shtml
[6] https://www.achrnews.com/articles/124595-doe-leaky-ducts-are-top-energy-waster
[7] https://www.eia.gov/electricity/annual/html/epa_08_01.html
[8] http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/seclaw.html
[9] http://web.archive.org/web/20150405010943/http://www.epa.gov/greenpower/gpmarket/
[10] https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/index.php?page=coal_home
[11] https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/index.php?page=oil_home
[12] https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/index.php?page=natural_gas_home
[13] https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/index.php?page=renewable_home
[14] https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/index.php?page=solar_home
[15] https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/index.php?page=wind_home
[16] https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/index.php?page=hydropower_home
[17] https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/index.php?page=biomass_home
[18] https://www.e-education.psu.edu/emsc240/node/508
[19] http://www.worldwatch.org/
[20] https://www.e-education.psu.edu/emsc470/sites/www.e-education.psu.edu.emsc470/files/Beyond%20Sustainababble%20-%20Engelman.pdf
[21] http://www.stlouisfed.org/publications/regional-economist/january-2012/dont-expect-consumer-spending-to-be-the-engine-of-economic-growth-it-once-was
[22] http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf
[23] http://www.epa.gov/sustainability/learn-about-sustainability#what
[24] https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/indicators/
[25] http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/KeyWorld2017.pdf
[26] https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/archive/aeo15/
[27] https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/0383(2017).pdf
[28] https://www.e-education.psu.edu/emsc470/808