Published on GEOG 3: The Future of Food (https://www.e-education.psu.edu/geog3)

Home > Lessons > Section 3: Systems Approaches to Managing our Food Systems > Module 8: Pests and Integrated Pest Management > Module 8.2: Weeds, Transgenic Crops for Pest Management, and Pathogens

Module 8.2: Weeds, Transgenic Crops for Pest Management, and Pathogens

Module 8.2: Weeds, Transgenic Crops for Pest Management, and Pathogens

Weeds are a major crop pest that persist in agricultural ecosystems, and significant resources are allocated to studying weeds and developing technologies to control them. What characteristics make weeds such significant pests and how can they be controlled? We will employ the plant lifecycle terms that you learned about in Module 6 to describe weed lifecycles and identify effective weed control practices. We will also explore how the principles of integrated pest management are applied in weed management; and you will learn about transgenic pest control practices that have been widely adopted for insect and weed control; as well as some plant pathogen management principles.

Weeds

Weeds

A weed is a plant that is not wanted or a plant growing in the wrong place. In agricultural systems, weeds tend to be unwanted because they compete with crops for light, water, and/or nutrients, and can reduce crop yield and/or quality, particularly if weeds are permitted to grow and reproduce. Weeds may reduce crop quality through contamination with seeds or plant parts that may be toxic, or of poor nutritional or culinary quality (produce off-flavor compounds). Some weeds may harbor crop insect pests or pathogens; and when weeds have a significant negative impact, they can reduce the economic value of agricultural land. On the other hand, if weeds are not numerous enough to reduce crop yield and quality, weeds can provide some agroecosystem benefits. For instance, weeds can provide:

  1. protection from soil erosion

  2. pollen, nectar, and habitat for beneficial organisms and wildlife
  3. forage for grazing animals

Competitive Characteristics of Weeds

Weeds tend to be plants that are adaptive and competitive in a range of environmental conditions. They typically have seeds or perennial storage organs that enable them to grow rapidly and produce aboveground canopies that compete with crop plants for light, and root systems that compete for nutrients and water. Annual weed species often grow and mature relatively quickly, producing seeds earlier than crops. To increase survival of their offspring, annual weeds often produce many seeds, and some species produce large seeds. Strategies to control annual weed species target terminating them early, to prevent them from competing with crops and producing seeds.

ragweed
Figure 8.2.1: Common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) may produce between 3000-4000 seeds per plant. See Invasive Species Compendium [1]for more information.
Credit: Heather Karsten
Lambsquarter
Figure 8.2.2: Annual Lambsquarter (Chenopodium album L.) weed in corn. Lambsquarter can produce up to 72,000 seeds per plant. For more information about this weed species see Extension Utah State University [2].
Credit: Heather Karsten

If perennial weeds are growing from the small seeds they produce, they establish more slowly than annual crop seeds. But seeds are not their primary form of reproduction, recall that perennial plants often spread and reproduce via established storage organs such as taproots, tubers, bulbs, and rhizomes (belowground modified stems that store reserves and enable a plant to spread horizontally), or aboveground stolons or storage stem bases. Perennial weeds growing from storage organs can be very competitive with crop plants. If perennial weed storage organs are cut and distributed over a larger area and reburied or partially covered, they can also establish and spread across a larger area. If weed storage organs are left on the soil surface to freeze and thaw over winter or desiccate in mid-summer, then tillage can terminate perennial storage organs. Repeated mowing of plant regrowth may weaken or deplete plant reserves, particularly if it is prior to the end of the growing season when perennials tend to translocate plant reserves to storage organs. Chemical control of perennials is also often most successful at this time when herbicides can be translocated to storage organs.

phragmites weeds
Figure 8.2.3: This Phragmites weed spreads by stolons and produces roots and shoots every few inches, that once established could survive as separate plants.
Photo Credit: Rod Stolcpart (Rock County, Nebraska Weed Superintendent)
rhizomes and roots
Figure 8.2.4: Rhizomes on Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense L.)
Credit: Jack Kelly Clark, courtesy University of California Statewide IPM Program
Yellow nutsedge tubers
Figure 8.2.5: Tubers on yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) 
Credit: Jack Kelly Clark, courtesy University of California Statewide IPM Program

Weed Survival Characteristics

Weed Survival Characteristics

In addition, many weeds have traits that enhance their survival and reproductive success such as: i. hard-seeds or seeds that can remain dormant for long time periods until environmental conditions for germination are good, enhancing weed seed success, ii. plant protective characteristics such as thorns, toxic tissues, protected growing buds, iii. adaptive growth to a wide range of environmental conditions also referred to as plasticity. For example, in a field or lawn that is grazed or mowed to a short height to control weeds, adaptive weeds can produce leaves very close to the soil surface and flowers on short stems below the mowing height.

buttercups
Figure 8.2.6: Buttercups (Ranunculus L. ) contain protective compounds that are toxic to most grazing livestock. For more information about buttercups see Creeping Buttercup, Pacific Northwest Extension Publications [3].
Photo: Heather Karsten
thistles
Figure 8.2.7: Thistles with protective thorns.
Photo: Heather Karsten

Check Your Understanding

Read about the Velvetleaf weed species (Abutilon theophrasti L.) at Velvetleaf. [4]

Velvetleaf has hard seed. How long can the seed survive? On the website click on the link that discusses Velvetleaf Adaptation and Stress. What examples does the author use to illustrate velvetleaf plasticity or ability to adapt to its growing conditions?


Click for the answer.

ANSWER: Velvetleaf can survive up to 50 years. Examples of plastic or adaptive growth include: i. when resources are NOT limited, a velvetleaf plant grew short and produced many seed capsules, ii. when many velvetleaf plants germinated close together, the plants grew tall to compete for light. iii. when a velvetleaf plant was growing along a roadside with poor soil conditions where it was frequently mowed, it still managed to produce a small plant and seeds.

Activate Your Learning: Weed Control Practices

Recall what you have learned about crop plant lifecycle classification and characteristics in Module 6.

Read the Australian Department of the Environment website that describes Integrated Weed Management [5]. Click on and read the links that describe each type of weed management technique. After you have read both of the above readings, answer the questions below.

Question 1 - Essay

Review examples of the four weed control strategies discussed in these two online publications. Explain at least two specific weed control strategies that are likely to be effective for controlling annual weeds and explain why they are effective for annual weeds.


Click for the answer.

ANSWER:

Annual weeds typically germinate, grow and develop to maturity and seed production quickly, and therefore can offer significant competition with crop plants for light, nutrients, and water. They can also produce seeds and increase weed population pressure relatively quickly. Therefore, annual weeds should be terminated early and especially prior to they produce seeds. Because annual weed species do not allocate significant resources to below ground storage organs, they can be terminated with mechanical or physical control tactics such as: plowing, cultivation, hoeing, removal by hand, hay making, mowing or grazing, soil mulching, and flaming. Allowing weed seeds to germinate and then terminating them with light tillage (stale seedbed) strategically uses tillage for weed control. Annual weed germination and establishment can be suppressed with cultural control practices such as crop rotation, rotating crops with different seasonal life cycles, successive planting (double or triple-cropping); the integration of cover crops; and managing for competitive crops with early crop planting and good crop management practices (competitive crop varieties, soil fertility and health management).

Chemical control with herbicides applied at the recommended time, and rotating or varying herbicide chemistry can reduce the evolution of herbicide-resistant weeds. Biological control can also reduce weed populations and may include conserving habitat for weed seed predators such beetles, small rodents, and birds by integrating cover and perennial crops on a farm, and avoiding pesticides that can reduce weed seed predatory populations. In addition, in some cases, browsing or grazing animals or specific pathogens of weeds such as bacteria or fungi are sometimes introduced.

Question 2 - Essay

Describe at least two weed control strategies that are likely to be effective to control perennial weeds. Explain why.


Click for the answer.

ANSWER:

Perennial weeds have below-ground storage organs that they can regrow from (ex. tubers, rhizomes, stolons, and bulbs); therefore mechanical control strategies such as tillage, cultivation, and hoeing can break up and distribute perennial weed storage organs, facilitating the spread of perennial weeds. Mechanical weed control tactics can be effective if they can bring the majority of the storage organ to the soil surface to desiccate or freeze, thaw, desiccate and die. Perennials typically begin storing reserves for spring regrowth in late summer and early autumn. Therefore, frequent mowing or flaming can deplete a perennial weed’s storage reserves, if the tactic is repeated multiple times, particularly during summer before the plant begins replenishing storage reserves.

Applying systemic herbicides that are taken up by the plant and translocated to storage organs is also most effective in late summer and early fall when perennial plants are replenishing storage reserves. Rotating or varying herbicide chemistry can also reduce the evolution of herbicide-resistant weeds.

Cultural control strategies for perennial weed control include crop rotation between perennials and annual crops, planting perennial crops with competitive annual companion crops that are harvested early, and managing for competitive crops with early crop planting and good crop management practices.

Biological control practices as described for annual weeds can reduce perennial weed populations, and be particularly cost-effective in rangelands where other practices are often cost-prohibitive. Biological control strategies may include introducing browsing animals such as goats that will eat thorny perennial weeds, or application of weed-specific pathogens such as bacteria or fungal spores.

Herbicide Resistance

Herbicide Resistance

Although integrated pest management was introduced in the 1980s, the number of weeds that have evolved resistance to new herbicides continues to grow (See Figure 8.2.8 below).

Graph showing the number of unique resistant cases from the years 1955 to 2015. Each year there is a gradual increase.
Figure 8.2.8: Global Increases in Unique Resistant Cases
Credit: Dr. Ian Heap, International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds [6]

Similar to other pests, weeds evolve resistance when exposed to the same strong selective force, such as an application of the same herbicide over consecutive years. When the same herbicide is applied numerous times to a field, susceptible weeds are killed, leaving resistant individuals to reproduce and dominate the population, as illustrated in figure 8.2.9 below.

Selection for herbicide resistance begins when a herbicide survives a particular herbicide application. The resistant biotype survives, matures and sets the seed. If the same herbicide continues to be applied and the resistant weeds reproduce, eventually the majority of the weeds will be resistant to the herbicide.
Figure 8.2.9: Selection for herbicide resistance begins when an herbicide resistant biotype survives a particular herbicide application. The resistant biotype survives, matures, and sets seed. If the same herbicide continues to be applied and the resistant weeds reproduce, eventually the majority of the weeks will be resistant to the herbicide.
Credit: J. L. Gunsolus. Weed Science, Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics. Herbicide-resistant weeds [7].

Integrated Weed Management

Integrated weed management (IWM) is an IPM approach for weeds that can provide long-term weed control of weeds by integrating multiple control strategies. Some weed scientists have described IWM as utilizing “many little hammers” as opposed to continuously employing one “big hammer” such as an herbicide (Liebman & Gallandt, 1997). Weed control tactics fall into the IPM control categories that you learned about for insect control in Module 8.1. Examples of weed control practices include the following:

  1. Cultural control practices are management practices humans can employ to prevent weed establishment and maintain vigorous crop growth. Examples include: crop rotation with crops of different life cycles and seeding densities, planting certified seed that is managed to have minimal weed contamination, planting adapted crop varieties, adjusting row spacing, population density, and timing for a competitive crop and successful crop establishment, maintaining soil health and fertility, and using practices that prevent weed establishment such as cover crops and mulching.

    straw mulch
    Figure 8.2.10: Straw mulch to suppress weeds in garlic.
    Credit: Heather Karsten
    buckwheat
    Figure 8.2.11: Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum L. ) cover crop planted mid-season to smother weeds, produce organic matter and provide habitat for beneficial insects.
    Credit: Anna Santini
    corn alfalfa wheat and spring oats
    Figure 8.2.12: Crop rotation of summer annual row crops such as corn (first photo) with densely seeded perennial alfalfa (second photo), and/or densely planted winter annual wheat and spring oats (third photo, wheat is on the right, oats are on the left).
    Credit: Heather Karsten
  2. Mechanical or physical weed control includes practices such as plowing, cultivation, hoeing, targeted hand-weeding, and flaming.
    Flex tine cultivator
    Figure 8.2.13: This flex tine cultivator is used to control weeds when they are very small.
    Credit: Heather Karsten
    Rotary harrow
    Figure 8.2.14: Rotary harrow for weed cultivation.
    Credit: Heather Karsten
  3. Biological control: conserving or introducing herbivorous insects, grazing or browsing animals, or plant pathogens to reduce weed populations. Biological control of weeds is typically used on extensive rangeland where other more labor intensive or expensive methods are not cost effective.
  4. Chemical control: the application of herbicides, or the use of herbicide-resistant crops with herbicide applications to control weeds
  5. Genetic resistance: selecting crop varieties that are well adapted to an environment and competitive with weeds. Herbicide-resistant crops may also be considered a form of genetic resistance.

Transgenic Crops for Pest Control

Transgenic Crops for Pest Control 

Transgenic crops or animals are often referred to as GMO’s or genetically modified organisms. This is misleading because all cultivated crop plants and livestock have been genetically modified through centuries of human selection and traditional breeding. A more accurate name for the genetically engineered organisms that are referred to as GMOs, is transgenic organisms. Transgenic crops or livestock contain genetic material that was transferred from a different species through biotechnology techniques or genetic engineering.

In the 1980s, agricultural input companies began developing and using transgenic techniques to develop new crop varieties. The first traits that were inserted into major crop plants and commercialized on a large scale were genes from two different species of bacteria. The transgenic traits were for insect resistance (Bt) and resistance to the herbicide glyphosate (commercially marketed as Round-up). Since the first commercial release in 1996, these technologies have been widely adopted in the US and other parts of the world (See Figure below).

Data for each crop category includes varieties with both HT and Bt (stacked traits).
Figure 8.2.15: Adoption of genetically engineered crops in the United States from 1996 - 2014. Data for each crop category include varieties with both HT (herbicide-resistant) and Bt (stacked) traits. Credit: USDA Economic Research Service [8], using data from Fernandez-Cornejo and McBride (2002) for the years 1996-99 and USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service [9], June Agricultural Survey for the years 2000-14.

Insect Resistant Bt Crops

Insect Resistant Bt Crops 

Bt is an abbreviation for Bacillus thuringiensis a bacteria that produces an enzyme that is toxic to the digestive system of insects in the Beetle; and Moth and Butterfly families. These two insect families include some major crop pests. Scientists have transferred the genes that code for the production of the toxins into crop plants. Because the Bt trait confers insect pest resistance, the adoption of Bt corn and Bt cotton has contributed to a significant reduction of insecticide use in these crops (See Figures 8.2.16- 8.2.18 below).

Figure18 hows that corn insecticide use decreases until 2002 and then levels, cotton insecticides increase from 1998- 1999, then reduces.
Figure 8.2.16: (Figure 12) Insecticide use in corn and cotton production, 1995-2010
Credit: Jorge Fernandez-Cornejo, Seth Wechsler, Mike Livingston, and Lorraine Mitchell. Feb. 2014. Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States [10]. USDA Economic Research Report Number 162.
Figure 8.2.18. See link in caption for text description
Figure 8.2.17: (Figure 18) Pounds of insecticide active ingredients (a.i.) per planted acre and percent acres of Bt corn, 1996 - 2008.
Figure 8.2.18: (Figure 19) Pounds of insecticide active ingredient (a.i.) per planted acre and percent acres of Bt cotton, 1996 - 2008.
Click for a text description of Figures 8.2.18 and 8.2.19.
Figure 18 is showing that as the pounds of insecticide/acre is decreasing ( except for an increase from 1998-1999), the percent acres of Bt corn is increasing from 1996 until 2008. Figure 19 is showing that as the pounds of cotton insecticides are generally decreasing, the percent of Bt cotton is increasing from 1996-2008.
Credit: Fernandez-Cornejo, Jorge, Richard Nehring, Craig Osteen, Seth Wechsler, Andrew Martin, and Alex Vialou. Pesticide Use in U.S. Agriculture: 21 Selected Crops, 1960-2008, EIB-124, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, May 2014.

Reading

Read this summary of the use and impact of Bt corn, in the following online article “Use and Impact of Bt Maize [11]” by: Richard L. Hellmich (USDA–ARS, Corn Insects and Crop Genetics Research Unit, and Dept of Entomology, Iowa State Univ, IA) & Kristina Allyse Hellmich (Dept. of Biology, Grinnell College, IA). 2012 Nature Education.

Check Your Understanding

Many Bt corn hybrids marketed today contain Bt Cry proteins that are toxic to the corn rootworm and are “stacked” or “pyramids”. To what does this stacked or pyramid in Bt hybrids refer?


Click for the answer.

ANSWER: Stacking or pyramids refer to plants that have multiple transgenic pest resistance traits, sometimes more than one protein targets one pest species, and in some cases, a plant produces toxins for more than one pest species, as well as herbicide resistance. For example, stacked Bt corn hybrids have Cry proteins that are toxic to corn rootworms and European corn borer.

Name three benefits of Bt corn for farmers.


Click for the answer.

ANSWER: Benefits of Bt for farmers include: reduced need to apply insecticides, increased crop yields, regional reductions of European corn borer populations that reduce the need to plant Bt corn each year, lower levels of grain mold infection and improved grain quality and value.

To prevent the evolution of pest resistance to Bt, what practices are most recommended?


Click for the answer.

ANSWER: To prevent pest resistance, a high dose of Bt toxin to eliminate susceptible individuals and recessive traits is recommended, as well as planting 5-20% of the field to of refuge corn (corn that does not express Bt) to sustain Bt-susceptible individuals that can reproduce with resistant individuals in the pest population. With stacked varieties of corn for instance, in the US, a farmer must plant a 20% refuge for both Bt traits together or 20% for each non-Bt trait separately.

Prior to the development of Bt crops, spores of the bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis were sometimes used as biological control for insect pests in forestry and agriculture, often on organic farms. Initially, commercial Bt crops were released in the US without any regulations to prevent resistance. But science had shown that pest populations could quickly evolve resistance to Bt, and planting Bt crops on a large scale across the agricultural landscape would create a strong selective force for pests to evolve resistance to Bt. Therefore, in response to public concern about the high risk of pests evolving resistance to Bt, the EPA convened a committee that developed a resistance management plan for Bt crops.

In addition to the crop expressing a high dose of the Bt toxin, to prevent or delay pest resistance to Bt farmers who plant transgenic Bt corn and cotton, are required to plant a refuge, a percentage of the crop field or a field close by that does not express the Bt trait. The refuge area conserves a population of insects that are susceptible to Bt, so that the susceptible insects can reproduce with insects that might have resistance to Bt, sustaining some Bt-susceptible individuals in the population. Depending on the presence of Bt crops in a region, the EPA regulation requires that farmers plant between 5% and 20% of their crop field without the Bt trait. For stacked Bt corn hybrids (with 2 or more Bt traits) farmers must plant the required refuge for each Bt trait that their crop expresses. For more information on refuge requirements, read Insect Resistance Management and Refuge Requirements for Bt Corn [12], from the University of Wisconsin.

Pest Resistance to Transgenic Bt Crops

Despite the refuge requirement in the US, western corn rootworm resistance to Bt corn was reported in multiple Midwestern states (Jakka et al., 2016). The first reported Bt-resistant corn rootworm populations were found in cornfields in Iowa that had been planted to Bt corn consecutively for at least three years, and the authors suggested that the fields likely did not include refuge corn (Gassman et al., 2011). Additional studies also found that the Bt toxin dose was not sufficiently high to delay the evolution of insect resistance and that corn rootworm could evolve resistance to additional Bt toxins in three to seven generations (Gassman, 2016). Further, in 2013 pest resistance to Bt crops was reported in 5 of 13 major pest species in a survey of 77 studies from eight countries across five continents, where resistance management requirements and enforcement varied. Practices that delayed resistance to Bt included the Bt crop expressing a high dose of the Bt toxin and an abundance of refuge crop planting (Tabashnik, et al., 2013).  In accordance with integrated pest management principles, entomologists also recommend that other control tactics be utilized to control pests targeted by Bt crops.

In a number of countries (ex. most countries in the European Union), Bt crops and transgenic crops were not approved for commercial production.  Concerns about the potential human health and ecological risks of transgenic crops limited acceptance of Bt crops and other transgenic crops. Applying the precautionary principle, some policy-makers and the public require more research and long-term assessment of transgenic traits on human health and ecosystems.  An interest in protecting domestic seed markets and companies may also contribute to policy decisions to prohibit the adoption of transgenic seeds produced by multi-national seed companies.

Herbicide Resistant Crops

Herbicide Resistant Crops

Herbicide-resistant (or tolerant) crops, such as glyphosate-resistant crops are transgenic crops that are resistant to the herbicide glyphosate. Glyphosate is a broad-spectrum herbicide that controls a wide range of plants and breaks down relatively quickly in the environment; it was first marketed under the trade name: Round-up. Round-up Ready soybeans were released in the US in 1996, and since then, additional glyphosate-resistant crops (corn, cotton, canola, sugarbeet, and alfalfa) have been developed and widely adopted in the US and other countries (Fernandez-Cornejo J. and S. J. Wechsler, 2015; Benbrook, 2014; Duke and Powles, 2009). See Figure 8.2.15 on the Transgenic Crops for Pest Control page: Adoption of genetically engineered crops.

roundup ready soybeans
Figure 8.2.19: Roundup Ready Soybeans
Credit: Heather Karsten

Herbicide-resistant (HR) crops such as glyphosate-resistant crops have facilitated the increased adoption of no-till or direct seeding of some HR crops because tillage is not needed for weed control. Once a crop has emerged, the risk of glyphosate herbicide damage to the HR crop is eliminated, making it easier for farmers to plant crops and control weeds without tillage. However, although Bt crops reduced insecticide use, the glyphosate herbicide must be applied to glyphosate-resistant crops to control weeds. Since they were first introduced in 1996, glyphosate use has increased. See the Figure 8.2.20 from the USGS Pesticide National Synthesis project below.

In addition, in contrast to Bt crops, the EPA did not require farmers to employ a glyphosate resistance management plan or refuge, and the number of weeds that are resistant to glyphosate has increased. Weeds have evolved resistance to glyphosate particularly in cases where farmers consistently applied glyphosate to manage weeds in HR crops and terminated cover crops and/or perennials with glyphosate prior to planting an HR crop. See the Figure 8.2.21 from the International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds illustrating the increase in glyphosate-resistant weeds below.

Graph of estimated glyphosate use of in millions pounds from 1991 to 2013. Increases in most every year.
Figure 8.2.20: Glyphosate Use in the United States by Year and Crop
Credit: USGS, Nat’l Water Quality Assessment Program, Pesticide National Synthesis project [13]
The increase in number of species from 1990 to 2015.
Figure 8.2.21: Increase in the Number of Glyphosate-Resistant Weeds Worldwide
Credit: Ian Heap. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds [14].

Stacked Herbicide-Resistant Crops

When the number of glyphosate-resistant weeds increased and became difficult to control, the agricultural-input industry developed transgenic herbicide-resistance crops that are resistant to additional herbicides. Dow AgroSciences developed a transgenic trait for resistance to 2,4-D, an herbicide that controls broadleaf weeds (dicot plants) and the company stacked or added the trait to soybean and cotton crops that also have resistance to glyphosate. And Monsanto produced a transgenic trait for resistance to an herbicide called dicamba that they stacked (or added to) soybeans that have glyphosate resistance. Dicamba and 2,4-D herbicides are volatile, and there is a risk that when the herbicides are sprayed, they will drift into neighboring fields and field edges, potentially damaging other crops and other plants. Wild plants in field edges and natural ecosystems often provide habitat for beneficial organisms, such as pollinators, pest predators, and wildlife. In 2017, Monsanto's crops with stacked dicamba and glyphosate resistance were available for use in some midwestern and southern states, where glyphosate-resistant weeds were particularly problematic. In 2017, there were so many reports and complaints from farmers about crop damage due to dicamba drift, that the states of Arkansas and Missouri banned dicamba spraying for some of the growing season. The EPA also investigated the complaints, and in autumn 2017, the EPA announced that the companies had agreed to new steps to reduce the risk dicamba drift with dicamba-resistant crops. For more information, see the EPA Registration of Dicamba for Used on Genetically Engineered Crops. [15]  

We will explore concerns about the stacked, herbicide-resistant technologies and tactics to manage glyphosate-resistant weeds more in the Summative Assessment.

Plant Pathogens

Plant Pathogens

Pathogens include fungi, bacteria, nematodes, and viruses, all biological organisms that can cause disease symptoms and significantly reduce the productivity, quality, and even cause the death of plants. Pathogens can also infect agricultural animals, but for this module, we will focus on plant pathogens. Read the following brief overview of plant pathogens, Plant Disease: Pathogens and Cycles [16].

Pathogens can be introduced and spread to host plants in many ways. Bacteria and fungal spores can be transferred by wind, in rain, and from the soil via rain splashing onto plant tissues. Insects can vector or infect a plant with a pathogen when they feed on an infected host plant, and then move and feed on an uninfected plant. Pathogens can also spread through infected seeds, transplants, or contaminated equipment, irrigation water, and humans.

Wilted pumpkin plant, see image caption
Figure 8.2.22: This pumpkin plant is infected with Bacterial wilt (Ralstonia Solanacerarum) that was vectored (introduced) by a cucumber beetle insect.
Photo Credit: Beth Gugino, Penn State University, Associate Professor of Vegetable Pathology
irrigation system
Figure 8.2.23: Center pivot irrigation of crops, such as this canola, could facilitate pathogen infection and disease development via soil-splashing and by creating high humidity in the plant canopy that could favor some pathogens.
Photo Credit: Chad Swank, courtesy of USDA Natural Resources Conservation Services, via Wikimedia Commons [17].

Plant Disease Triangle: Plant pathologists have identified three factors that are needed for a plant disease to develop:

i. a susceptible host Some pathogens have a narrow host plant range, meaning they can infect just a few host species. For instance, the primary host crops of Late blight (Phytophthora infestans) are tomato and potato. For more information see Tomato-Potato Late Blight in the Home Garden [18].  By contrast, pathogens with a wide host plant range can infect many different host species. There are almost 200 plant species that can be infected by Bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum). For more information, see Bacterial Wilt - Ralstonia solanacearum [19].

ii. a disease-causing organism (pathogen). Plant pathogens include fungi, bacteria, viruses, and nematodes. For examples, again, see the reading: Introduction to Plant Diseases [20], A. D. Timmerman, K.A. Korus. 2014. University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Extension. EC 1273.

iii. a favorable environment for the pathogen. Pathogens usually require specific humidity and temperature conditions for pathogen infection and disease symptoms to manifest. For instance, Late Blight disease symptoms are most likely to occur when the weather is cool and wet.

Disease develops when all three are present: pathogen, susceptible host, and favorable enviroment.
Figure 8.2.24: Disease Triangle
Credit Heather Karsten

Disease Diagnosis

The three disease triangle factors are important for diagnosing the cause of disease symptoms. Pathologists consider the weather, environmental conditions and the host species to diagnosis what pathogen is causing disease symptoms. Pathologists also consider other factors that could favor and help diagnose a disease, such as i. the field history, particularly what crops and pathogens were present in the past, ii. current crop management practices, iii. when disease symptoms were visible, and on what other species. To assist farmers and others with disease diagnosis, many land-grant universities in the US have crop and animal diagnostic disease clinics where one can submit diseased tissue samples with detailed information that can aid in the diagnosis, such as the host species, environmental conditions, the site history, and management.

Pathogen Management

Although disease control practices could be categorized into the pest control approaches that were discussed earlier for managing insects and weeds (genetic, cultural, chemical, etc.), plant pathologists typically describe pathogen control tactics with more specific language. For instance, Exclusion tactics involve rejecting infected transplants from being introduced to a farm.

Prevention or Avoidance of pathogen introduction and spread tactics include:

  • crop rotation, particularly for pathogens with narrow host ranges
  • sanitizing equipment for planting, trellising, pruning, and harvesting
  • managing for healthy vigorous crops with optimal soil and water nutrient management
  • managing to avoid environmental conditions that promote pathogens, such as avoiding very humid conditions due to over-watering, or promoting drying of plant surfaces with wide row spacing to facilitate air flow, or using drip-tape irrigation that waters plants at or below the soil surface versus over the canopy
  • using physical barriers such as row covers, mulch to reduce water splashing; and high tunnel/hoop houses or greenhouses to prevent the introduction of rain and wind-borne pathogens
various plants with wide row spacing in a field
Figure 8.2.25: Multiple pest control practices on this organic farm help prevent pathogen infection and spread, while also helping to control insect pests and weeds. Wide row spacing allows for inter-row weed cultivation as well as airflow to reduce crop canopy humidity; crop rotation and intercropping plants from different plant families interrupts pathogen and insect spread; and straw mulch that prevents soil-borne pathogens from splashing onto plants also suppresses weeds.
Photo Credit: Heather Karsten
drip tape irrigation under plastic mulch
Figure 8.2.26: Drip tape irrigation under plastic mulch avoids splashing soil-borne pathogens onto crops and is also a more efficient use of irrigation water.
Plastic mulch also raises soil temperatures, promoting crop growth and helps to suppress weeds.
Photo Credit: Elsa Sanchez, Penn State, Professor of Horticultural Systems Management, Dept. of Plant Science
Stake plants growing in long rows under domed cover
Figure 8.2.27: High tunnels, plastic mulch, and sanitized stakes all avoid introducing pathogens to these tomato plants, while also promoting crop growth.
Photo Credit: Elsa Sanchez, Penn State, Professor of Horticultural Systems Management, Dept. of Plant Science

Genetic resistance to pathogens is a very valuable and important pathogen control tool. Many plant breeding programs select for genetic resistance to pathogens. When available, pathogen resistance traits are included in most crop variety descriptions to help growers select appropriate crop varieties for their farm.

tomato plants suffering from blight
Figure 8.2.28: This tomato variety trial included tomato varieties that were resistant or susceptible to late blight.
Photo Credit: Beth Gugino, Penn State, Associate Professor of Vegetable Pathology.

If disease symptoms develop, infected plants may be Eradicated or destroyed. And materials that may have been contaminated with pathogens, such as the soil and planting containers, can be heated to very high temperatures with pasteurization equipment or through solarization. For instance, soil may be solarized by placing black plastic over the crop bed (planting zone) during the warm season to increase the soil temperature and destroy pathogens prior to planting the crop.

Therapy or Fungicides (chemical control) may be applied to infected plants to terminate pathogens. Particularly when plant pathogen symptoms are identified early and favorable weather conditions for the pathogen are projected to continue, fungicides can prevent disease spread and significant economic losses. In some high-value crop systems, the soil may be fumigated prior to planting crops.

Similarly, in agricultural livestock systems, animals with disease symptoms can be treated with antibiotics. And in some livestock production systems, antibiotics and vaccinations are administered to animals to prevent diseases and pathogen infection.

Activate Your Learning

Read Nonchemical Disease Control [21], from Colorado State University Extension and identify some pathogen control tactics that could also qualify as other types of pest control categories that we have explored in this module (such as genetic, cultural, and chemical control).


Click for the answer.

ANSWERS:
  • Cultural control strategies: Prevention and Avoidance through crop rotation and management of the crop environment. Exclusion and Eradication of inoculum through sanitation to the survival of plant pathogens on crop residues and agricultural equipment and managing for healthy vigorous crop growth.
  • Genetic: Resistance, Selecting and breeding crop varieties for resistance to plant pathogens is one of the primary means of disease management, particularly in agronomic crops.
  • Chemical: Fungicides that are toxic to pathogens
  • Physical or mechanical: Protection of crops via barriers such as plant netting or soil mulching. Eradication could also be qualified as a physical control strategy
  • Regulatory: Quarantines

Summative Assessment: Herbicide-Resistant Weed Interpretation and Management of Multiple Pest Types

Summative Assessment: Herbicide-Resistant Weed Interpretation and Management of Multiple Pest Types

Note

Please read through the entire assignment before you begin the assignment. Once you have done that, return here to follow the link and review the information.

Explore the International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds [22] and answer the questions below. On the International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds Homepage, examine the trends of herbicide-resistant weeds. In the left column chose "Summaries" by "US State Map" and by "Country". By moving your cursor over the states and scrolling down the list of countries, compare the number of herbicide-resistant weed species across a range of geographical regions. You can also view the data as a “Global Map.”

You will also use the following information in the proposed scenario:

Dow AgroSciences developed a transgenic trait for resistance to 2,4-D, an herbicide that controls broadleaf weeds (dicot plants), that has been transferred to soybean, corn, and cotton crops. The trait is stacked or added to soybeans that also have resistance to glyphosate, and another herbicide called glufosinate.

Monsanto has produced a transgenic trait for resistance to an herbicide called dicamba, that they are stacking (or adding to) soybeans that have glyphosate resistance. Some formulations of the dicamba herbicide are volatile, and there is a risk that when farmers spray dicamba it will drift into neighboring fields and field edges, potentially damaging other crops and wild plants in field edges and natural ecosystems. These field edges and other plants often provide habitat for beneficial organisms, such as pollinators, pest predators, and wildlife.

Please also read these short NPR articles on dicamba:

With ok from EPA use of controversial weedkiller is expected to double [23]

A wayward weed killer divides farm communities harms wildlife [24]

If you are interested in more information about the use of dicamba and Arkansas' recent restrictions on the herbicide you may read or listen to the following brief (3-minute) story: Arkansas defies Monsanto moves to ban rogue weed killer [25]

Directions

Read the following scenario and in approximately 450-500 words answer the questions below. I suggest you write your response in a separate document and then copy and paste it into Canvas. Once you have posted your own answers, you need to respond to ONE classmate. Your response should be approximately 150 words.

Assume you manage a 200-acre corn and soybean farm in Southern Pennsylvania. You keep up with the latest technological advances in farming and use seeds from either Dow or Monsanto depending on what your seed salesperson recommends. You are proud of your farm and strive to keep your crops free from both weeds and harmful insects that could damage your crop and cut into your profits. Your immediate neighbors on the East side have a large organic vegetable production farm. Based on what you have observed on the above website, the information mentioned above, and from what you have learned through the readings in this module, answer the following questions:

  • What are some potential problems you might encounter if you adopt seeds with the new herbicide traits listed above? How do these problems differ between now and in the future?
  • What other weed-control strategies could you use to control glyphosate-resistant weeds?
  • How might your pest management system affect your neighbors?
  • Are there strategies you can use to mitigate potential harm to your neighbors’ fields?
  • If you were farming in Thailand or Egypt instead of in Pennsylvania, what might explain differences in the number of herbicide-resistant species you encounter there compared to your farm in the United States?
  • If you farmed in Canada, Australia, or Western Europe what might explain the herbicide-resistant species you encounter there?

Consider the following possible questions when responding to a classmate:

  • How do their answers differ from yours?
  • Are there suggestions you can make to help them improve their IPM practices-for weeds as well as insects?
  • Do they have possible solutions you could use on your farm?
  • Is there a question you have about why or how they answered the way they did?

Files to Download

Module 8 Summative Assessment Worksheet [26]

Submitting Your Assignment

Submit your response in Module 8 Summative Assessment Discussion in Canvas.


Source URL: https://www.e-education.psu.edu/geog3/node/731

Links
[1] http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/4691
[2] https://extension.usu.edu/weedguides/files/uploads/Chenopodiaceae.pdf
[3] http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1957/16924/pnw399.pdf
[4] http://agron-www.agron.iastate.edu/~weeds/Ag317-99/id/WeedID/vlf.html
[5] http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/invasive/weeds/management/integrated.html
[6] http://www.weedscience.org/
[7] https://extension.umn.edu/herbicide-resistance-management/herbicide-resistant-weeds
[8] http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/adoption-of-genetically-engineered-crops-in-the-us/recent-trends-in-ge-adoption.aspx
[9] https://www.nass.usda.gov/
[10] https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=45182
[11] http://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/use-and-impact-of-bt-maize-46975413
[12] http://corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Management/pdfs/A3857.pdf
[13] http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/pnsp/usage/maps/compound_listing.php
[14] http://weedscience.org
[15] https://19january2017snapshot.epa.gov/ingredients-used-pesticide-products/registration-dicamba-use-genetically-engineered-crops_.html
[16] https://cropwatch.unl.edu/soybean-management/plant-disease
[17] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:NRCSID00021_-_Idaho_(4033)(NRCS_Photo_Gallery).jpg
[18] http://extension.psu.edu/tomato-potato-late-blight-in-the-home-garden
[19] http://extension.psu.edu/bacterial-wilt-ralstonia-solanacearum
[20] https://www.e-education.psu.edu/geog3/sites/www.e-education.psu.edu.geog3/files/Mod8/Timmerman%20and%20Korus%202014_0.pdf
[21] https://extension.colostate.edu/topic-areas/yard-garden/nonchemical-disease-control-2-903/
[22] http://weedscience.org/
[23] http://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2017/10/13/557607443/with-ok-from-epa-use-of-controversial-weedkiller-is-expected-to-double?
[24] http://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2017/10/07/555872494/a-wayward-weed-killer-divides-farm-communities-harms-wildlife
[25] http://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2017/09/22/552803465/arkansas-defies-monsanto-moves-to-ban-rogue-weedkiller
[26] https://www.e-education.psu.edu/geog3/sites/www.e-education.psu.edu.geog3/files/Mod8/Summative%20Discussion%20Module%208-Revised%20October%202017.docx