Published on *METEO 469: From Meteorology to Mitigation: Understanding Global Warming* (https://www.e-education.psu.edu/meteo469)

Even in the presence of the greenhouse effect, the net longwave radiation emitted out to space must balance the incoming absorbed solar radiation. So, we can think of the Earth system as still possessing an *effective radiating temperature* (*T _{e}*), which is the

When a greenhouse effect is present, the temperature at the surface, *T _{S}*, will be substantially higher, however, due to the additional

We can attempt to account for this effect by by simply changing the way we model the longwave radiation in the zero-dimensional EBM to account for the additional downward longwave radiation component.

Returning to the linearized form of the energy balance equation (i.e., equation 3 above), we will, therefore, now relax the assumption that A and B are given by their* black body* values. Instead, we will allow A and B to take on arbitrary values. This is a crude way of taking into account the fact that the Earth does not behave as a black body because the atmosphere has non-zero emissivity due to the presence of atmospheric greenhouse gases.

Simply put, we can tweak the values of A and B until they provide a good approximation. We refer to this generalized version of the black body approximation as the *gray body* approximation. The gray body model is a very crude way of accounting for the greenhouse effect in the context of a simple zero-dimensional model. In Lesson 5, we will build our way up to more realistic representations of the atmospheric greenhouse effect.

Various gray body parameter choices for A and B have been used by different researchers, in different situations. Since the gray body approximation is a linear approximation to a non-linear (Planck radiation) relationship, it is only valid over a limited range of temperatures about a given reference temperature. This means that a different set of parameters might be used for studying, e.g., the ice ages than would be used for studying, e.g., the early Cretaceous super greenhouse.

It turns out that the choices $A=214.4W/{m}^{2}$ and $B=1.25W/{m}^{2}K{}^{-1}$ yield realistic values for the current average temperature of the earth *T _{S}*, and gives a value for the

Credit: Reprinted with permission from: *A Climate Modeling Primer*, A. Henderson-Sellers and K. McGuffie, Wiley, pg. 58, (1987).

**Use the Online 0d EBM Application [1] to estimate the average temperature of the Earth for the "mid-range IPCC" gray body parameter values. What surface temperature do you find, and how does it compare with the previous black body estimate of Earth's surface temperature?**

Click for answer.

You should have found that *T _{S }*= 288

This is roughly 33^{o} C (or 60^{o }F!) warmer than the black body value.

In other words, the greenhouse effect has the effect of warming Earth from a frigid average temperature of -18^{o} C to a far more hospitable 15^{o} C!

Let us rewrite the equation energy balance equation (3) above in a slightly different form,

$${T}_{S}=\left[{F}_{in}-A\right]/B$$

$${T}_{S}=\left(\raisebox{1ex}{$1$}\!\left/ \!\raisebox{-1ex}{$B$}\right.\right){F}_{in}-\raisebox{1ex}{$A$}\!\left/ \!\raisebox{-1ex}{$B$}\right.$$

where* F _{in}* represents the total incoming radiative energy flux at the surface, which includes incoming short wave radiation, but also any potential changes in the downward longwave radiation towards the surface.

Let us now consider the response of *T _{s}* to an incremental change in

$$\Delta {T}_{s}=\frac{\Delta {F}_{in}}{B}$$

We can also rewrite (6) as

$$\frac{\Delta {T}_{s}}{\Delta {F}_{in}}=\frac{1}{B}$$

The change in downward longwave radiation forcing associated with a change in CO_{2} concentration from a reference concentration, [CO_{2}]* _{0}* to some new value, [CO

$$\Delta {F}_{C{O}_{2}}=5.35\mathrm{ln}\left(\frac{\left[C{O}_{2}\right]}{{\left[C{O}_{2}\right]}_{0}}\right)$$

Now, let us further specify that we are interested in the change in radiative forcing resulting from a *doubling of atmospheric CO _{2} concentrations*. For a CO

$$\Delta {F}_{2xC{O}_{2}}=5.35\mathrm{ln}\left(\frac{560ppm}{280ppm}\right)=3.7\frac{W}{{m}^{2}}$$

We can define *equilibrium climate sensitivity*, *s*, as the change in temperature resulting from a doubling of pre-industrial CO_{2} concentrations; *s* has units of K (or equivalently degrees C, since differences in C and K are equal). To estimate s, we combine equations (6) and (9)

$$S=\Delta {T}_{2xC{O}_{2}}=\frac{\Delta {F}_{2xC{O}_{2}}}{B}=\frac{3.7}{B}$$

The equilibrium climate sensitivity is the equilibrium warming we expect in response to CO_{2} doubling. In the simple case of the 0d EBM, it is readily calculated through equation (10).

**Using the formula above (10), estimate the equilibrium climate sensitivity s for both the black body model and our standard version of the gray body model. Record your answers.**

Click for answer.

For the *black body* model, we have:

$S=3.7W{m}^{{}^{-}2}/[4.6W/{m}^{-2}{K}^{-1}]=0.8K$, i.e., approximately 1K

For the standard *gray body* model, we have:

$S=3.7W{m}^{{}^{-}-2}/[1.25W/{m}^{-2}{K}^{-1}]=2.96K$, i.e., approximately 3K.

**Let's now use the Online 0d EBM Application [1] again to estimate the climate sensitivity for these two cases, by explicitly varying the CO _{2} level until you achieve a CO_{2} doubling, and recording the warming that you observed. Compare to the results you calculated above directly from the formula for climate sensitivity for the 0d EBM.**

Click for answer.

We find the same answers that we found earlier, namely that the black body models gives just under 1^{o} C warming, while the gray body model gives roughly 3^{o }C warming.

As we will see later, this is close to the best current available estimate of the warming expected from a doubling of CO_{2} concentrations.

**Links**

[1] https://www.e-education.psu.edu/meteo469/sites/www.e-education.psu.edu.meteo469/files/lesson03/0d_EBM.html

[2] http://go.owu.edu/~chjackso/Climate/papers/Myhre_1998_New%20eatimates%20of%20radiative%20forcing%20due%20to%20well%20mixed%20greenhouse%20gasses.pdf