Published on *PNG 520: Phase Behavior of Natural Gas and Condensate Fluids* (https://www.e-education.psu.edu/png520)

From the last module, it is very likely that one question is left in our minds. How can we adjust the ideal model to make it suitable for real gases? Well, we already have the answer. We said that once we have established a *base (ideal) model*, we look at a real case by estimating how close (or far) it performs with respect to the *base (ideal) case,* and introducing the corresponding corrections. Again, such corrections will take into account all the considerations that our original assumptions left out.

For the case of gas behavior, we introduce a correction factor to account for the discrepancies between experimental observations and predictions from our *ideal* model. This correction factor is usually referred to as the *compressibility factor* (Z), and is defined as:

$$Z=\frac{V}{{V}_{Ideal}}$$ (7.1)

In the previous equation, *V* is the real volume occupied by the gas and *VIdeal* is the volume that the *ideal* model predicts for the same conditions. The ideal volume is given by:

$${V}_{Ideal}=\frac{nRT}{P}$$ (7.2)

Hence, the equation of state for real gases is written as:

$$PV=ZnRT$$ (7.3)

Engineers are very much familiar with this equation, to the extent that it is usually recognized as *Engineering EOS*. Please note that for Z = 1, this equation collapses to the* ideal gas model*. In fact, unity is the compressibility factor of any gas that behaves ideally. However, please note that Z = 1 is a *consequence* of ideal behavior, but this is* not* a definition.

Is it possible to have a real gas at a condition at which Z=1 without being ideal (far removed from the ideal-gas theory assumptions)?

For natural gases, the most enduring method of estimating Z has been the Katz-Standing Method. However, we are now living in a computer-driven era, where thermodynamic estimations are very rarely taken from graphs or plots, as was common in the past.