Water treatment technologies are designed to eliminate harmful effects of pollutants and natural substances to human health and environment. Within the blended water cycle (considered on page 6.1), these technologies are often placed at the transitions between the environment and human sphere to adapt the water quality.
For example, when water passes from the environmental source to the human consumption system, there is a possible risk to human health from some natural bacteria, chemical elements. Hence, natural water (from either surface or underground reservoir) needs to be purified to a certain standard. On the other end of the system, the water containing waste or substances resulting from the domestic, agricultural, or industrial activity must be cleaned before returning to the environmental pathways. If this is not done, harmful effects of concentrated pollutants can cause significant disturbance to the natural water ecology and escalate damage to both ecosystem and society in the long run. Some common effects of wastewater pollution include eutrophication (biological nutrient pollution; for example, releasing access of nitrogen and phosphorus —"overfeeding ecosystem"); oxygen depletion (due to oxidation of organic compounds); odor and aesthetic damage; proliferation of harmful bacteria, viruses, fungi in drinking water supply.
Centralized water treatment
Centralized water treatment approach implies treating large amounts of water at large rates in a "central" location and distributing that water via networks of pipelines, channels, and intermediate reservoirs. Centralized water treatment is largely implemented and maintained in major urban areas and in most parts of the developed world. Probably most of us primarily use the centralized treatment in our lives (maybe except some travel circumstances).
A couple of videos below describe large-scale water treatment systems that are designed to remove undesired contaminants from water.
This first video shows an example of how water is treated during its transfer from the environmental source to the drinking water supply:
This second video illustrates the treatment of the wastewater generated by human activity before it is returned to the environment:
As we can see from these videos, the design of a large-capacity water treatment plant is very complex and involves not one but many steps, each of those utilizing multiple technologies. It is not our goal to learn all of them in detail in one lesson. However, should you have a specific interest in this topic, the US EPA Wastewater Technology Fact Sheets web page can serve as a great resource for obtaining more technical information about them.
Depending on the degree of cleaning and purification, treated water can be reused for:
- irrigation of agricultural crops or Landscape irrigation (e.g., schoolyards, golf courses, residential gardens);
- groundwater recharge;
- recreational use (e.g., lakes and ponds, fisheries, snowmaking, marsh enhancement);
- non-potable urban use (e.g., fire protection, air conditioning, toilet flushing );
- potable use;
- industrial use (e.g., cooling, process water).
The main concern in water reuse is to meet the water quality requirements for its intended use. Quality requirements are determined by federal, state, and regional regulatory authorities and may vary. The general guidelines by EPA with regards to the effluent from the wastewater treatment facilities are given in Table 6.2 below:
|Daily maximum||Weekly average||Monthly average|
|5-day Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5)||60 mg/L||45 mg/L||30 mg/L|
|5-day Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand (CBOD5)||50 mg/L||40 mg/L||25 mg/L|
|Total Suspended Solids (TSS)||60 mg/L||45 mg/L||30 mg/L|
Here is an explanation of measures in this table if you are not familiar with the terms:
- BOD5 is the amount of oxygen needed to oxidize organic matter in a water sample. The difference in oxygen content is usually measured over the time span of 5 days (that is the reason for subscript 5). For reference, water from a very clear source may have a BOD of less than 2 mg/L; sewage water may give readings above 100 mg/L; food processing wastes may have BOD of thousands.
- CBOD5 is the amount of oxygen needed to oxidize carbonaceous organic matter (excluding nitrogen compounds)
- TSS is the amount of particulate matter (insoluble) present in a water sample, which is usually determined by filtering the solution and weighing the residue remaining on the filter.
- pH is the measure of acidity of solution in chemistry (defined as pH = -log[H+]). Acidic solutions, such as acid rain, may have pH around 1-2, relatively neutral solutions range within 5-9 (distilled water pH=7), and alkaline solutions have pH 10-14.
These limits determined by EPA are included in the government regulations, published in the Rules of Department of Natural Resources [CSR, 2014]. This document also contains extensive data on limitations imposed on the contents of the toxic element in water before it is reused or discharged in a certain way to the environment. Check Table A for the maximum tolerated concentrations of metals (p.24) and organics (p. 26). The toxicity requirements are especially relevant to industrial water use.
Chemical tests to determine the above metrics are used as controls at any wastewater treatment plant. Various technologies are developed to improve the treatment efficiency and to produce a cleaner effluent suitable for further use.
Engineered ecological systems for water treatment
Traditional water treatment plants accomplish an important function. However, these facilities themselves produce significant environmental impact by consuming energy, producing emissions, by-products, and waste to be disposed of. Later in this lesson, an example is given for a life cycle assessment study which analyzes the way to make these systems more benign.
One of the trends in improving the environmental profile of wastewater treatment facilities is the design of ecological systems that mimic natural processes of neutralizing the pollution.
Here are a couple examples of the development of such systems:
- Living Machine and Biomatrix systems (see photo above):
- Eco-Machines systems - ecological fluidized bed, or a small constructed wetland
These examples show that ecological treatment systems typically work at the small scale being capable to treat liquid waste from a community of 300-1000 people. This makes them attractive for decentralized treatment for secluded autonomous areas.
Decentralized systems for water treatment
Decentralized systems of water purification often become technologies of choice in developing countries because they do not require huge infrastructure or can be set up quicker when infrastructure is destroyed. Small-scale technologies provide quick response to urgent needs. There are multiple ways to approach the issue. Here is one of them: watch this 10 min video to see an example how small-scale technology can help solve large-scale problems.
Good morning everybody. I'd like to talk about a couple of things today. The first thing is water. Now I see you've all been enjoying the water that's been provided for you here at the conference, over the past couple of days. And I'm sure you'll feel that it's from a safe source.
But what if it wasn't? What if it was from a source like this? Then statistics would actually say that half of you would now be suffering with diarrhea. I talked a lot in the past about statistics and the provision of safe drinking water for all. But they just don't seem to get through. And I think I've worked out why. It's because, using current thinking, the scale of the problem just seems too huge to contemplate solving. So we just switch off: us, governments and aid agencies. Well, today, I'd like to show you that through thinking differently, the problem has been solved. By the way, since I've been speaking, another 13,000 people around the world are suffering now with diarrhea. And four children have just died.
I invented Lifesaver bottle because I got angry. I, like most of you, was sitting down, the day after Christmas in 2004, when I was watching the devastating news of the Asian tsunami as it rolled in, playing out on TV. The days and weeks that followed, people fleeing to the hills, being forced to drink contaminated water or face death. That really stuck with me. Then, a few months later, Hurricane Katrina slammed into the side of America. "Okay," I thought, "here's a First World country, let's see what they can do. "Day one: nothing. Day two: nothing. Do you know it took five days to get water to the Superdome? People were shooting each other on the streets for TV sets and water. That's when I decided I had to do something.
Now I spent a lot of time in my garage, over the next weeks and months, and also in my kitchen -- much to the dismay of my wife. (Laughter) However, after a few failed prototypes, I finally came up with this, the Lifesaver bottle.
Okay, now for the science bit. Before Lifesaver, the best hand filters were only capable of filtering down to about 200 nanometers. The smallest bacteria is about 200 nanometers. So a 200-nanometer bacteria is going to get through a 200-nanometer hole. The smallest virus, on the other hand, is about 25 nanometers. So that's definitely going to get through those 200 nanometer holes. Lifesaver pores are 15 nanometers. So nothing is getting through.
Okay, I'm going to give you a bit of a demonstration. Would you like to see that? I spent all the time setting this up, so I guess I should. We're in the fine city of Oxford. So -- someone's done that up. Fine city of Oxford, so what I've done is I've gone and got some water from the River Cherwell, and the River Thames, that flow through here. And this is the water. But I got to thinking, you know, if we were in the middle of a flood zone in Bangladesh, the water wouldn't look like this. So I've gone and got some stuff to add into it. And this is from my pond.
(Sniffs) (Coughs) Have a smell of that, mister cameraman.
Okay. (Laughs) Right. We're just going to pour that in there.
Michael Pritchard: Okay. We've got some runoff from a sewage plant farm. So I'm just going to put that in there. (Laughter) Put that in there. There we go. (Laughter) And some other bits and pieces, chuck that in there. And I've got a gift here from a friend of mine's rabbit. So we're just going to put that in there as well. (Laughter) Okay. (Laughter) Now.
The Lifesaver bottle works really simply. You just scoop the water up. Today I'm going to use a jug just to show you all. Let's get a bit of that poo in there. That's not dirty enough. Let's just stir that up a little bit. Okay, so I'm going to take this really filthy water, and put it in here. Do you want a drink yet? (Laughter) Okay. There we go. Replace the top. Give it a few pumps. Okay? That's all that's necessary. Now as soon as I pop the teat, sterile drinking water is going to come out. I've got to be quick. Okay, ready? There we go. Mind the electrics. That is safe, sterile drinking water. (Applause) Cheers. (Applause) There you go Chris. (Applause)What's it taste of?
Chris Anderson: Delicious.
Michael Pritchard: Okay. Let's see Chris's program throughout the rest of the show. Okay? (Laughter)
Okay. Lifesaver bottle is used by thousands of people around the world. It'll last for 6,000 liters. And when it's expired, using failsafe technology, the system will shut off, protecting the user. Pop the cartridge out. Pop a new one in. It's good for another 6,000 liters.
So let's look at the applications. Traditionally, in a crisis, what do we do? We ship water. Then, after a few weeks, we set up camps. And people are forced to come into the camps to get their safe drinking water. What happens when 20,000 people congregate in a camp? Diseases spread. More resources are required. The problem just becomes self-perpetuating. But by thinking differently, and shipping these, people can stay put. They can make their own sterile drinking water, and start to get on with rebuilding their homes and their lives.
Now, it doesn't require a natural disaster for this to work. Using the old thinking, of national infrastructure and pipework, is too expensive. When you run the numbers on a calculator, you run out of noughts. So here is the "thinking different" bit.
Instead of shipping water, and using man-made processes to do it, let's use Mother Nature. She's got a fantastic system. She picks the water up from there, desalinates it, for free, transports it over there, and dumps it onto the mountains, rivers, and streams. And where do people live? Near water. All we've got to do is make it sterile. How do we do that?
Well, we could use the Lifesaver bottle. Or we could use one of these. The same technology, in a jerry can. This will process 25,000 liters of water; that's good enough for a family of four, for three years. And how much does it cost? About half a cent a day to run. Thank you.
So, by thinking differently, and processing water at the point of use, mothers, and children no longer have to walk four hours a day to collect their water. They can get it from a source nearby. So with just eight billion dollars, we can hit the millennium goal's target of halving the number of people without access to safe drinking water. To put that into context, The U.K. government spends about 12 billion pounds a year on foreign aid. But why stop there? With 20 billion dollars, everyone can have access to safe drinking water. So the three-and-a-half billion people that suffer every year as a result, and the two million kids that die every year, will live. Thank you.
Click on the link below to read about some small innovations that make big difference when applied at the right place at the right time:
6 Water-purifying Devices for Clean Drinking Water in the Developing World
Next, let us get a little bit deeper into the issue. I ask you to read the following paper which analyzes a case study of a decentralized wastewater treatment system in India. It covers enough technical details to understand how the technology works and provides a useful discussion of environmental, economic, and social aspects:
Dhinadhayalan, M., Nema, A., Decentralised wastewater management - New concepts and innovative technological feasibility for developing countries, Sustain. Environ. Res., 22(1), 39-44 (2012).
While reading, focus on understanding the pros and cons of the decentralized approach (compared to central distribution system). In your own notes, list three key advantages of decentralized technologies that justify their development and implementation. Also, list three disadvantages that may limit their use in different parts of the world. Can you imagine to use only de-centralized water treatment in your current location? What kind of social impacts might it create?
Check Your Understanding
The BOD is a measure of which type pollutant in the water?
Click for answer.
Organic matter; BOD is the amount of oxygen needed to oxidize the organic compound in a given volume of water.
Check Your Understanding
Which stages in wastewater treatment are designed to decrease BOD of the effluent?
Click for answer.
Aerobic biological (bacterial) decomposition. Bacteria in a well-aerated pool are capable of decreasing BOD by over 90%